Financial Samurai had an interesting post recently asking if rich and powerful people are trying to keep the middle class down. I went through the comments and was really surprised to find that the vast majority said “of course not!” and there were some shy “maybes”, mostly pointing the rich are trying to keep their circle closed. Of course they want to keep the poor down! I am surprised at the comments to be the first one to say it clearly. Maybe because in Guatemala, it is way more obvious.
If there was a decent minimum wage, and work ethics, how would you afford a full time staff or five? How would you build a mansion if the labor was expensive? And most importantly, how would your company give you the benefits that sustain your lifestyle if your workers earned twice as much?
No only it is less money in your pocket, but you also give the worker freedom to work less since they make more. Meaning they won’t want to work for you much longer, and your whole company and leisurely lifestyle may be in jeopardy. If you read my post about the lifestyle of the rich in Guatemala, you’ll know they live much, much better than the average U.S. millionaire. And it all boils down to one little detail: cheap labor. A normal, upper middle class family can afford a maid, a nanny for the kids, a driver, a handyman, and bodyguards if needed. The wife can have daily salon pampering and the husband’s car will be washed every morning. All that staff will take care of your every needs for under $1,500 a month. Of course you never want the maid to get rich!
I had a well paid job. It didn’t take me long to do the Financial Independence math and start saving so I could quit my job at 29. Since then, I have made more money but I have not produced anything tangible that benefited the economy. I have enjoyed passive income from rentals or the stock market, and typed whatever came out of my head on that computer. If everyone was like me, we would all be starving. Poor people are the backbone of the economy.
Another obvious example in Guatemala are the coffee farms’ private shops. Before, as a coffee farm worker, you got paid in tokens every week. Your tokens were valid for food and sundries at the farm’s shop… owned by your boss. Most of the money he paid you ended back in his pocket. Sometimes you would even be charged for the bed he provided for you on site. You could exchange your tokens for real money but there would be little left after you ate that week. It was pretty close to slavery, but when you look closely, the average low class worker is not much better off.
Poor people play the lottery, they gamble, they drink alcohol, smoke cigarettes, all those things that are so easy to access help keep them docile and in desperate need of a job. Poor people are offered easy credit and shiny objects are places right in front of them on giant billboards so they want it so bad they don’t realize the “small, convenient, monthly instalment” will last for the next eight years, giving them no choice but to stay put at that job they hate. They consume the products they make and the rich profit from it. And then, there is a family to maintain, kids who want iStuff and cool clothes (a reader wondered why a one income family in the 1950s was able to make it just fine when a two income family struggles those days, that’s why: we want too much crap we can’t afford).
Sam says he doesn’t understand why there is a child tax credit under a certain level of income. In my opinion, having children is encouraged in hopes you will produce a nice little worker that will pay taxes, fund your pension and produce the goods you want to consume. It is worth the $1,000 tax credit tenfold.
Those kids will probably get in debt for a less than ideal degree, credit card debt, take consumer loans, you name it. The interest on those loans also make it worth the $1,000 initial cash advance.
The rich need middle class workers. People who are ready to do any job at any salary level.
As per the need of constantly having to find reassurance from within that we have indeed more than the neighbors, Guatemala’s high society hosts regular pissing contests to see who has the biggest yacht, the more sqft in their houses, or the most decadent wedding. But there is also a hard working, discreet set of millionaires that pulls the ropes in the background and you never hear about. They buy thousands of acres of public land and build popular housing with government incentives and tax breaks, or get dibs on public offerings, making more than you can imagine. And they are just as reluctant as the flashy rich guys about welcoming a new kid to the club.
So that is why I think the rich don’t want the low and middle class to get any better. Not because they don’t want them to be rich, because they need an affordable and docile workforce to do the work for them. They may allow the occasional crazy FI aspirant but they don’t want to spread the word that it is possible to get ahead, or they would have to go back to work too.
What do you think?
This post was featured on Quit Your Day Job, thanks!
Will says
Oh, you and I think alike. There’s always the risk of ‘too many chiefs not enough Indians’.
norm says
bloody right off course
Sam says
In the bright side, Sounds like the rich in Gautemala are providing for a lot of jobs though!
Edward says
“…a reader wondered why a one income family in the 1950s was able to make it just fine when a two income family struggles those days, that’s why: we want too much crap we can’t afford).” <– So much this! I've been making this point every time somebody brings up the good old 50s/60s/70s (often an era they weren't even alive yet!) but they brush it quickly aside 'cause they don't want to hear that maybe their own spending may be partially at fault for their financial woes.
Anyway, I think the point that "live was great in the 50s" is sort of moot. If you asked a random black man in 1950s Mississippi if standard of living was amazing, he'd probably tell you otherwise. …As would a white man living in the hills of Appalachia. The so-called "wealthy" and "middle class" were an extremely small percentage of the overall population back then.
Pauline says
Totally. It is like people are entitled to a lifestyle above their means just because they work and can’t wait to save for something when they want it.
Anne @ Money Propeller says
I would say that the perspective in Guatemala is quite different. Statistically, I am rich in Canada. I don’t live an extravagant lifestyle and I don’t want to keep the poor, poor.
I don’t want minimum wage raised, but it is NOT because I want to keep the poor down, it is because raising the minimum wage usually hurts minimum wage earners the most, because they tend to spend their incomes in places where the workers earn minimum wage, like on groceries, restaurants, cell phone providers, retail and bars. When the prices go up in those places, I spend less money there, so they can employ even fewer people, and poor people can’t afford to spend money there either, so everyone loses.
Pauline says
I was more talking about the handful of family that run a country. Oil or media tycoons, industrial magnates… the upper middle class lives well and does vote but one of those powerful persons can have more influence than a whole county worth of votes.
DC @ Young Adult Money says
You bring up a good point. I used to not understand “fair trade” coffee, but now it makes sense. It does sound like a lot of workers on coffee farms are basically slaves due to the compensation structure. They’ll never get ahead enough to take a week off to find other work because they’d risk starving in the process.
Pauline says
Well now the farm slavery has been replaced with high double digits interest rates on consumer goods. Most of my workers don’t have much left after payday, sometimes they ask for more money to cover an emergency.
Jayson @ Monster Piggy Bank says
In society, as long as you abide in the law like what a minimum wage is you are fine. As an employer, sometimes you may feel you want to give more for a job well done and it’s up to you. I think it’s far more better to help the middle class have opportunity in life not only for them to maintain their class level but also to level up theirs in a class-system society.
Michelle says
We try to buy items that are labeled fair trade. It seems like those workers can never get out of the cycle.
Alain says
Very interesting subject Pauline!
I started replyint on your blog and realized I had a lot to say so I decided to write a post on my blog too… lol
study says
helloo
Forte School of Music is providing Music Lessons in Howick Auckland , New Zealand. Forte School is best in Music , Singing , Guitar and Piano Classes. Contact us now 09 534 2223